CM-U: All right. Let's start with when you made it, and did you make it in New York?
Wade Guyton: All right. This piece was made in New York. But I didn't make it in this studio. At that time, let's see, it was about—it would have been December 2009. Right?
CM-U: So just last December?
Wade Guyton: No. No, 2008, sorry.
CM-U: No, eight, okay.
Wade Guyton: Okay, December 2008, in my studio in midtown, which is much smaller than this. So I was never able to see the whole piece together until I got it to Milan. So I was making individual…
CM-U: Oh, so you never actually saw it installed together.
Wade Guyton: I didn't see it. And I actually didn't know if it would work as one, single piece until it was installed there.
CM-U: How did you—I mean this is jumping ahead, I know, but did you have to play with where the parts went in relation to one another?
Wade Guyton: Luckily, if I remember correctly, as it was unpacked, the proprietors took them out of the crates. We stretched them in New York, and then sent the eight individual canvases there. And I knew the room. I knew it was a long, narrow room. And I hoped it would work, but I still wasn't sure if it would. And as they unpacked the individual panels, they just leaned them against the wall. And if I remember correctly, that order we kept, so...
CM-U: Is that important to you, that element of chance? That that's the way they came out?
Wade Guyton: Yes. I mean it always—I'm not saying that I wouldn't have changed it, but I think it did work out, luckily. And the chance—chance is always involved in my work in a number of ways. And in the installation as well as in the making so…
CM-U: What about…
Wade Guyton: But this piece would not be rearranged. Like that one opening of the crate, and arranging the paintings would happen once. And then that became—then the piece was complete, and that became the template for the piece. So it's not like we could rearrange the panels again.
CM-U: Right. Okay. And what about the distance between? Just while we're on installation.
Wade Guyton: Um, I decided that on-site, but I knew that the spacing would make a big difference. I was able to see like two or three together in the studio, and I realized as they were further apart, that this white gap became a major part of the piece. And the gap between like this white part of each panel is kind of a gap in the printing. It's part of the file, but it's a hole in the file. And so that this gap and this gap, their relationship was really important. So the spacing—I realized as this space got closer to this. These being more similar seemed to work better, holding the piece together as one. And as they got further apart, you—you read them as individual panels. And if they got too close together—the strange thing is as they got closer together, they also read as separate panels. And when you're looking at it with this spacing. Or at least I have even now, I get confused. I don't really get confused, but optically, there's a confusion between that space and—or where the panels might end. Like the fold in each panel and the gap between the panels. It's really clear like in a photograph, straight on. You always—your eyes want to go to the gap between, instead of to the center of the painting.
CM-U: That's interesting. Why is that, do you think?
Wade Guyton: I don't know.
CM-U: That's right. That's right. That is true.
Wade Guyton: Yeah. But I like that experience, and I had only shown the individual panels before. And of course, the center seam was the center. And I always hang them low, they have something to do with my body size, and relating to—relating to that center seam and the symmetry or asymmetry of the panel. So putting them all together, this other space popped out at me.